update planning

This commit is contained in:
Noa Aarts 2026-02-06 14:44:41 +01:00
parent 130a64755f
commit 7d09aa88ab
Signed by: noa
GPG key ID: 1850932741EFF672
4 changed files with 98 additions and 23 deletions

View file

@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ or research usage, generally, one or a few topologies are used by the user in th
The proposed method is to use user defined criteria, such as expressivity, entanglement (e.g., Schmidt
strength@quantum-dynamics-physical-resource), and number of trainable parameters as a cost function, and generating an Ansatz to best fulfill
the requirement given a topology. Methods of generating the Ansatz can be done either by procedural generation
(algorithmic), using optimization methods such as genetic algorithms@architecture-search@evolutionary-architecture-search, or by using machine learning
(algorithmic), using optimization methods such as genetic algorithms@genetic-expressibility@evolutionary-architecture-search, or by using machine learning
methods such as generative AI@generative-quantum-eigensolver. The choice is to be determined by the MSc. student, based on a review of
methods.
Targets for the projects are comparisons on standard benchmarks of the QML Ansatz using hardware
@ -95,6 +95,16 @@ This experience will be useful since my project will have a significant focus on
= Risk Management
== Project related
The planned search does not perform well at all, in this case I'll try to figure out why it isn't perfoming decently.
If I find that it just won't work I'll write down the negative result so someone else doesn't get the same idea later.
To mitigate the risk of losing progress I will be using Git all throughout my development cycle. This will give a
history of edits made to the code and texts so I can easily go back to an earlier point if something didn't work out.
== Personal
Due to the nature of making something new, there are a couple of risks in the time management.
If, after the literature research, I decide to use a certain strategy and figure out that it won't work
much later on this could lead to a significant amount of wasted time.
@ -141,30 +151,37 @@ to join as well.
week(9), [Work on Project],
week(10), [Work on Project],
week(11), [Work on Project],
week(12), [Work on Project],
week(13), [Work on Project],
week(14), [Create progress report],
week(15), [Midterm],
week(16), [Benchmarking],
week(17), [Implement Project Improvements],
week(18), [Implement Project Improvements],
week(19), [Benchmarking],
week(20), [Implement Project Improvements],
week(21), [Implement Project Improvements],
week(22), [Testing with hardware],
week(23), [Implement issue fixes],
week(24), [Testing on hardware],
week(25), [Write Report],
week(26), [Write Report],
week(27), [Draft 1],
week(28), [Green Light],
week(29), [Write Report],
week(30), [Draft 2],
week(31), [Write Report],
week(32), [Final version],
week(33), [],
week(12), [Prepare project for surgery],
week(13), [Prepare for surgery],
week(14), [Surgery],
week(15), [Recovery],
week(16), [Recovery],
week(17), [Recovery],
week(18), [Recovery (might take longer, if so the rest slides)],
week(19), [Work on Project],
week(20), [Work on Project],
week(21), [Work on Project],
week(22), [Create progress report],
week(23), [Midterm],
week(24), [Benchmarking],
week(25), [Implement Project Improvements],
week(26), [Implement Project Improvements],
week(27), [Benchmarking],
week(28), [Implement Project Improvements],
week(29), [Implement Project Improvements],
week(30), [Testing with hardware],
week(31), [Implement issue fixes],
week(32), [Testing on hardware],
week(33), [Write Report],
week(34), [Help Organise Festival],
week(35), [Help Organise Festival],
week(36), [Help Organise Festival],
week(37), [Write Report],
week(38), [Draft 1],
week(39), [Green Light],
week(40), [Write Report],
week(41), [Draft 2],
week(42), [Write Report],
week(43), [Final version],
)